b) Mohd. Iqbal Ahmed Vs. State of A.P, MANU/SC/0181/1979 : AIR 1979 Supreme Court 677, in which the Honourable Supreme Court held that, prosecution has to prove that there was valid sanction and the ...
This analysis details a decade-long legal battle catalyzed by an employee's fundamental act of misconduct, which culminated ...
2. The question that arises for consideration in these appeals is whether an insurance policy in respect of a goods vehicle would also cover gratuitous passengers, in view of the legislative amendment ...
9) The trial is still pending before the Additional Sessions Judge, Dindoshi at Mumbai and therefore, the detenu will have to execute a bond which will lend assurance that he would attend the Trial ...
2. The petitioner-Payal Hariom Verma is directed to be released on bail on her executing P.R. Bond in the sum of Rs.30,000/- with one or two sureties in the like amount in connection with C.R.
A distinction has to be made between a "continuing wrong" and a "recurring wrong". The difference between the two has been clarified in Union of India v. Tarsem Singh MANU/SC/7976/2008 : 2008:INSC:930 ...
14. In other words, a complaint of sexual harassment is mandatorily required to be filed within a period of three months from the date of the last incident of such harassment or within a further ...
Section 63 of the BSA, which replaces the often-litigated Section 65B of the IEA, is the procedural gateway for admitting electronic evidence. It establishes a strict certification mandate that is ...
With no evidence of an overt act or the requisite intent, the Supreme Court found that no prima facie case existed against Keshav Mahato under either the SC/ST Act or the related Indian Penal Code ...
Scheduled Caste or a Scheduled Tribe. KESHAW MAHTO @ KESHAW KUMAR MAHTO Vs STATE OF BIHAR & ANR. Dated: JANUARY 12, 2026.
In one of the most counter-intuitive changes, the BSA effectively ends the long-standing legal debate over what constitutes an "original" file versus a "copy." As clarified in Explanation 4 and ...
The WhatsApp messages which are virtual verbal communications are matters of evidence with regard to their meaning and its contents to be proved during trial by evidence-in-chief and cross examination ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results