It is undoubtedly one of the most famous names in human history, but now the question is being asked whether the name "Jesus ...

Scientists say that the name of Christianity’s central figure wasn’t originally Jesus Christ — he went by another title in his mother tongue that’s nothing like today’s iteration, the Daily Mail ...

This evolution of Jesus's name is not the only historical curiosity. For instance, Jesus Christ was not born on December 25 ...

those who believe the wonder-working Jesus of the Gospels is the real Jesus, and those who think the real Jesus—the man who inspired the myth—hides below the surface of the Gospels and must be ...

Jesus, the lord and saviour would have gone by Yeshua or Yeshu, which were the two of the most common names in Galilee at the time.

These writers presented Jesus as a real historical person. Denying the reliability of these sources in connection to Jesus would cast serious suspicion on the rest of ancient history. Now these ...

This story appears in the December 2017 issue of National Geographic magazine. This month’s cover story, “What Archaeology Is Telling Us About the Real Jesus,” does what people have been ...

That means Jesus' real name was most likely Yeshu Nazareen. The most obvious reason that Jesus' name wouldn't have sounded like the English version of 'Jesus' is that he wouldn't have spoken English.

Scientists claim Jesus Christ’s original name is not what we call him today. Also, Christ is not a surname but an honorific meaning ‘God’s anointed one’. What is the son of God’s real title then?

Now, which is right? Which is the real Jesus speaking here? We discovered that there are several different portraits of Jesus enshrined in the shape of the traditions about him, and that these ...

Both groups claimthat they can get to the real Jesus. And that if you read the sources right, you make the right selection of the sayings and the materials, you will find the real Jesus.