In Trump v. CASA, the Supreme Court significantly narrowed federal courts’ power to issue “universal” or “nationwide” injunctions—broad orders that bar the government from enforcing a policy against ...

A demonstration outside the Supreme Court on Friday, June 27. (Ava Blando) In a 6-3 decision last Friday, the Supreme Court granted the Trump administration a partial, but crucial, victory in its ...

A review of the US Supreme Court’s decision in Trump v. CASA, Inc., which held that federal district courts’ universal preliminary injunctions that enjoin government officials from implementing and ...

Injunctive relief plays a critical role in resolving disputes when immediate action is needed to prevent harm that money alone cannot fix. Whether an employer seeks to protect confidential business ...

The United States Supreme Court has ruled that lower courts likely overstepped their authority in issuing nationwide injunctions against presidential actions, limiting the ability of the judicial ...

Yesterday, in a 6–3 decision in Trump v. CASA, the United States Supreme Court sided with the Trump administration in a case involving an executive order that purports to eliminate birthright ...

The best that can be said for Trump v. CASA is that it could have been far worse. Its methodology and conclusions are myopic and wrong, and it is especially unwelcome during a period in which each ...

The Supreme Court, in a 6-3 decision, granted the Trump administration's request to partially stay nationwide injunctions of President Donald Trump's restrictions on birthright citizenship, finding ...

Nearly all the universal injunctions blocking President Donald Trump's agenda were issued by just five of the nation's 94 federal district courts, a statistic that the administration said lays bare ...